Send As SMS

Friday, May 26, 2006

The forgotten victims: persecution of Christians in Asian and African countries

What about the constant persecution of Christians in Asian and African countries?

In India alone, there have been at least 75 incidents of anti-Christian attacks so far this year.

There have been hundreds of attacks against clergy members and other Christians in the last few years in India, including murders, gang raping, bomb attacks, threats and other violence.

The Indian government does nothing about it.

Wednesday, May 24, 2006

Links

Weblogs

Up Pompeii. Exposing Islamic Jihad in Britain and Europe
 
Get Religion
 
Fundamentally Right
 
My Learning Curve
 
The Politically Incorrect Mom
 
Liberal Implosion
 
Mr Minority
 
Real Britain
 

Directories and search engines
Homerweb Search
 
Blog Excerpts

 
YooFindit.com: Search Directory - Human edited internet search directory of business, shopping, health, travel, sports, games, computers and more.
 

Politically correct insults

To say things like “racist” or “fascist” has become these days the equivalent of what in the past could have been, I suppose, “sinner” or “heretic”.

I mean that they are and are meant as just insults thrown at somebody, and they don’t have any of the original meaning any more.

Their over-use and use out of context or rather in the wrong context (in the case of the modern insults) guarantee that their sense has been lost.

They are simply insults representing the current ideology (political correctness), and orthodoxy, much as perhaps the older abuse did.

They have no specific meaning. All they mean is generic. They mean: I am in the majority and you are in the minority, therefore I am right and you are wrong (because for the kind of people who use them might is right).

Tuesday, May 23, 2006

The nature of power

Political public speakerPower is always held by a minority.

It is in the nature of things, of human beings, of human societies.

Democracy has been created just to limit and moderate the consequences of this, but it cannot overturn it.

Majorities are not suitable for command. First of all, the average intelligence of a great mass of human beings will never be as high as that of an elite. Secondly, a large number of people is unlikely to share the same views beyond obvious aspects of agreement, so there will be factors of internal division. Thirdly, there is an element
of amorphousness in a mass of people. It is perhaps well expressed by the terms “silent majority”. It’s uncharacteristic and unlikely that a great number of people will be determined at the unison towards any given objective, whereas a minority can be very resolute and belligerent.

I would compare a majority to a ball of paper, and a minority (or elite minority) to a sharp point of a knife or sword.

Friday, May 12, 2006

Religion

Religion posts

Christianity is a crime punishable by death under Sharia law
 
Eastern religions are not as animal loving as commonly assumed
 
Religions are not the same, not even monotheistic religions
 
Distorted perceptions of Islamic violence
 
In case you have not had enough of The Da Vinci Code
 
The forgotten victims: persecution of Christians in Asian and African countries
 
What's wrong with The Da Vinci Code
 
Do you have doubts whether to believe The Da Vinci Code?
 
The Israeli question
 
Some religions are more equal than others: the existence of double standards
 
Leave Mel Gibson alone
 
A strange thing happened to me on my way to the Comments...
 
More on double standards, the Jews, Mel Gibson
 
UK Muslims back 7/7: so what's new?
 
Violence has a different definition for Muslims
 
Muslims are necessarily fundamentalists
 

Society

Society posts

Welfare state, students, immigration
 
Relationships
 
Why when we say 'racism' do we think of white racism?
 
Sex is outside morality?
 
Immigration: UK public was never consulted
 
Women get away with murder
 

Culture

Culture posts
Clash of civilizations?
 

Politics

Political posts
Socialism is ethically wrong
 
The nature of power
 
Politically correct insults
 
Paradox of the Left
 

Thursday, May 11, 2006

Eastern religions are not as animal loving as commonly assumed

The myth that Eastern religions are animal loving is, indeed, a myth.

Compare this (fiction):

“Hindu groups are well known for promoting vegetarianism and animal rights, particularly the protection of cows.” (from The Myth of the Hindu Right webpage
http://bharatvani.org/books/civilization/partII10.htm)

with this (fact):

“Among the Hindus of Nepal, animal sacrifices are common even today, not only for the mother goddess, but also for almost all deities of the Hindu pantheon. The Hindu way of slaughtering the animal may be less painful than others, as it involves an immediate severing of the whole neck of the animal by one quick stroke of a sword or an axe (otherwise great calamities are believed to befall the sacrificer), rather than slitting of the throat.” (from Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_sacrifice)


Even Buddhism is not so kind to animals as is commonly taken for granted.

Not only did Buddha taste beef but it is well known that he died due to eating pork. Emperor Ashok, after converting to Buddhism, did not turn to vegetarianism; he only restricted the number of animals to be killed for the royal kitchen.